Einschätzung der WP...
...durch faz.net von Dietmar Dath. wired.com berichtet: In der engl. WP hat man es nicht geschafft einen völligen Unsinnsartikel loszuwerden [[en:Talk:Electric Universe (concept)]] Und das obwohl dieser in der der engl. WP schon mit "wacko nonsens" beschrieben wurde. Ich zitiere:
Self-contradiction
If this stuff proposes that the stars are externally powered, why then The Sun behaves as a unipolar inductor producing a current that flows outwards which clearly states that the sun is an energy source? I know this is wacky psuedo-science, but shouldn't it at least attempt to be internally consistent? William M. Connolley 18:07:53, 2005-07-13 (UTC).
"It's complete cobblers," said Dr. David Hughes, comet expert and professor of astrophysics at Britain's University of Sheffield. "Absolute balderdash."
Self-contradiction
If this stuff proposes that the stars are externally powered, why then The Sun behaves as a unipolar inductor producing a current that flows outwards which clearly states that the sun is an energy source? I know this is wacky psuedo-science, but shouldn't it at least attempt to be internally consistent? William M. Connolley 18:07:53, 2005-07-13 (UTC).
"It's complete cobblers," said Dr. David Hughes, comet expert and professor of astrophysics at Britain's University of Sheffield. "Absolute balderdash."
posted by Patrick-Emil Zörner | 3:14 PM
0 Comments:
Kommentar veröffentlichen
<< Home